The Great Advaitin
The great Advaitin, Madhusūdana Saraswati, concludes his commentary on this chapter with the following remark: „I don’t know any other reality than Krsna, whose hands are adorned with a flute, whose luster is like that of a new rain cloud, who wears a yellow cloth, whose lips are reddish like the bimba fruit, whose face is beautiful like the full moon, and whose eyes are like lotuses… Those fools who cannot tolerate the wonderful glory of Krsna go to hell.”
(Bhagavad-gita. Its Feeling and Philosophy,
Swami B.V. Tripurari, 15.20, purport)
I like what guru maharaja does here. This is what makes his Gita so special to me, so broad and brave. I remember I read somewhere the criticism against Swami for placing in the commentary on Gita the references to the commentary by Madhusudana Sarasvati, who is an impersonalist.
This is such a misunderstanding. Isn’t it appealing to read a “great Advaitin” saying: “Those fools who cannot tolerate the wonderful glory of Krsna go to hell”? How I see it, is that the beauty, charm, sweetness, lovability of Krishna are such, that even someone who is philosophically convinced and situated in Brahman, can’t resist. What sweetness is there in the light, emptiness, freedom from pain? Not much. The mind is peaceful, the desires are not biting - calm, space, silence, serenity - but it seems that the soul can’t find his full prospect there. He needs more. He needs the blues.
Another thing is, how masterly Swami does it. He shows great respect for the spiritual school so different, opposite or you could even say at times hostile to ours and in the same time elegantly establishes the superiority of Vaisnava doctrine. In his purports to few previous verses he establishes this superiority philosophically, sastrically, quoting from Viśvanatha Cakravarti Thakur, Baladeva Vidyabhusana, explaining differences between different purushas, etc. It is very scriptural, solid. But in the last paragraph of the chapter what he does? He says (at least how I see it): “Whatever – believe what you want, have your own interpretation, your own bhasya, but the truth is, Krishna is just the best. That's it.”
So inspiring.
As for Madhusudana Sarasvati himself, I like him. His attraction for Krishna pops here and there. I guess he must had been going trough a tough existential crisis. “Is Brahman superior? Or is Krishna? What will happen with me when I reach perfection? Merging with the Light? Well… it’s nice, great, isn’t it what I want? But… that Krishna, he is so charming, so sweet, cool, funny, pretty… Could I just serve him eternally? But how could I? The identity is temporary, illusory, there is no I, there is no him, there is nobody, we are all one… Oh, dammit!”

